A Deep Dive into the Two Oceans Ballot Entry Process

Share:

Having more people wanting to run your race than you can accommodate is a good problem to have. We are very fortunate to have this problem at Two Oceans for the 2026 event, especially considering the problems experienced in recent years.

The interim board committed to be open, honest and transparent in communications and decision-making – and this promise holds true with the election and appointment of the permanent board. In previous years, the number of ballot entries submitted has not been made public but the total number of ultra marathon (17,094) and half marathon ballots (28,506) has already been shared on social media.

Both are the highest numbers of entries ever received. Whilst the half marathon has always reached its allotment, there have been years when the ultra still had room left at the inn or only just managed to surpass the threshold. This has resulted in a lot more rejection and disappointment than in previous years.

In the spirit of transparency, this article provides a detailed breakdown of the ballot selection process and where every entry goes.

Why does Two Oceans need a ballot process?

A common question and sentiment from those who didn’t get the “Congratulations” message in the first ballot is, “It should be first come, first served.”

When a race is heavily oversubscribed, a ballot system provides a much fairer entry method. If it was first come first served the entries would likely sell out in hours (I think it was around 7 hours for ultra entries for the Covid-cancelled 2020 event). This prejudices those runners who do not have a stable and fast internet connection and gives an advantage to those that do. It also prejudices those in jobs where they cannot sit in front of a high tech computer screen and keep clicking refresh as well as those who are in service jobs with long shifts like nursing.

A first come, first serve system also puts massive strain on the computer systems and this can be expensive to accommodate for, especially as the current entry system is still very much on a legacy platform. There is a substantial risk of having the server crash and everyone being unhappy.

The ballot system has been in place for the half marathon since 2016 and for the ultra marathon post-Covid. At present, Two Oceans is the only road race that I am aware of that uses a ballot system but Cape Town Marathon will almost definitely introduce a ballot system in 2026. Comrades are still determining their entry process for the 100th running in 2027 but I would not be surprised to see a ballot system introduced there as well.

Ballot systems are commonplace in all the marathon majors. To put things in perspective, London Marathon has just 17,000 of their 50,000 places open to general ballot and received 840,318 applications in 2025 which meant you had a meagre 2% chance of getting in. As we’ll see, you have a much better chance of getting lucky at Two Oceans than you do in London.

Spoiler Alert: What doesn’t matter

I have seen a lot of conspiracy theories thrown around and can confirm that your race, gender, where you live, when you submitted your entry, whether you DNFed at Comrades this year and what brand of toilet paper you use did not influence the ballot draw. The only factor that would boost your chances is how many previous Two Oceans events you’ve completed.

One factor that is not considered and I feel should be is speed. In the ultra marathon, I think men who have achieved a silver medal in recent years or have run a sub-3 marathon in the qualifying window and women with a sub-4h30 finish or 3h20 qualifier should be given preference. This gives an incentive to the runners at the front of the field. Good for age times should also be considered. These are on the table for consideration at the second ballot draw so keep up your training!

I also think consideration should be given to provide preference to those who participated in the ill-fated, sub-standard 2025 event. This would provide some restitution to those that paid Michelin Star entry fees but received a McDonalds experience.

One final consideration for the final draw would be whether to remove anyone from the half marathon ballot who has already been successfully selected for the ultra marathon. There are strong arguments on both sides but my own personal leaning would be to limit it to one successful ballot per person but allow the true running addicts the chance to get their fix during the substitution window.

Why can’t you increase the permit limits?

After the 2025 permit breach and subsequent promises and commitments made by the 2025 board that were not kept, the City of Cape Town was understandably irate with Two Oceans. From the City’s perspective, they did not care that there was a largely new board in place as they have ‘heard the same promises before.’

At one stage, securing a 2026 race date and event permits from the City of Cape Town was touch and go. Huge credit must go to interim chair Chris Goldschmidt, vice chair Glenn Muller and Stillwater for working some magic so that we are in the position where some people are disappointed that they didn’t get an entry on the first ballot and not that the entire running community is disappointed that there is no Two Oceans at all next year.

The City has given Two Oceans one last chance to prove that Cape Town’s problem child has reformed and can ‘act like a grown up.’ The bottom line is that there is no room to negotiate the permit limits or other related conditions with the City of Cape Town for the 2026 event.

I am very confident that with bringing on Stillwater as our professional event staging partner, 2026 will restore the previous status of Two Oceans. A successful 2026 event and a potential change of finish venue should provide scope to increase the entry numbers for 2027 without impacting the runner experience.

But let’s not get ahead of ourselves…

How many ballots are available and where do the rest go?

The City of Cape Town’s permit for the 2025 event allows 14000 ultra and 17000 half marathon entries (this is the same number granted for the 2025 event). We will not exceed these numbers because that would mean the end of Two Oceans.

The first ballot made 9,000 ultra and 10,500 half marathon entries available for selection. The remainder are allocated to international runners (which is done on a first come first serve basis), charity entries (also first come first serve with a premium on the entry which benefits the charity), Blue Numbers (those with 25+ finishes get free entry and other Blues pay full price but get early preferential entry), Two Oceans Marathon Initiative (TOMI) free entries for disadvantaged runners and there are a small number of complimentary entries (e.g. given to sponsors).

The exact projected breakdowns for the ultra and half are presented below (this is exactly what was presented to the City of Cape Town on 1 September as part of our monthly recovery report plan to them). The first ballot allocations are deliberately prudent and are about 1,000 below the total ballot projections to mitigate any risk of overselling.  All excess entries will be allocated in the second ballot (which will also include any remaining entries not taken by the below categories and September ballot entries not paid for by 31 October).

There were 936 BNC ultra and 1,309 BNC half marathon entries booked and paid for in the preferential window. This means that the difference to the above projection (264 ultra and 191 half entries) will be added to the second ballot pool drawn in November.

On a personal note, I understand that board members are allocated two complimentary tickets each. As a Blue Number holder I have already paid for my entry and have allocated one entry to a runner who has recently lost his job and will give the other entry to a runner who would not otherwise be able to run the ultra. I am not yet sure if my wife plans to run but, if so, she will have to sort herself out (and won’t be getting an A seeding).

I can also commit that no board members will be allocated hundreds of entries to give to their friends, families and followers in 2026.

Who got the 9000 ultra marathon ballots?

There were 17,094 ballot entry applications. With 9,000 entries on offer this means that 52.7% of the total applicants got an entry in the first ballot draw.

  • There were 323 Blue Numbers Club (BNC) members and they all got an entry. These are additional BNC runners that did not enter in the preferential guaranteed entry slot window for whatever reason.
  • There were 4,141 runners who had completed 3 or more Two Oceans ultra marathons. They all got an entry.
  • There was a small group of 303 applicants who have one or two Two Oceans ultra finishes but have completed five or more Two Oceans events in total. They all got an entry.
  • This left everyone else, 12,329 applicants, with 4,233 entries available which equates to a 34.3% chance of getting selected.

Who got the 10500 half marathon ballots?

There were 28,506 ballot entry applications. With 10,500 entries on offer this meant that overall 36.8% of the applicants got an entry in the first ballot selection.

  • There were 237 BNCs and they all got an entry.
  • There were 3,039 runners who had completed 4 or more Two Oceans half marathons and they all got an entry. This is one finish higher than the same draw in the ultra as 3 or more would leave hardly any entries available for the general ballot.
  • There were 660 applicants with five or more Two Oceans events completed but fewer than 4 half marathons. They all got an entry.
  • This leaves 6,564 remaining ballots with 24,570 applicants which drops the selection probability down to 26.7%.
  • This was split into a 70% allocation for club runners (4,595) and 30% to unlicensed runners (1,969). In both cases 1,000 ballots were reserved for first time entrants.

The detailed breakdown for the last bullet above is:

  • Club Runner & Run Before: 5,302 applicants / 3,595 available = 68% selection probability
  • Club Runner & Novice: 4,470 / 1,000 available = 22% selection probability
  • Non-Club Runner & Run Before: 5,734 / 969 available = 17% selection probability
  • Non-Club Runner & Novice: 9,064 / 1,000 available = 11% selection probability

Didn’t get in on the first draw – what next?

If you were one of the unlucky 8,096 ultra or 18,006 half marathon applicants who did not get in on the first ballot draw, don’t despair there are still plenty of options available.

There will be a second ballot draw in November which will consist of all remaining entries plus unpaid ballot one entries returning to the entry pool. In the past, between 8 and 14% of the first ballot entries were unpaid and returned to the entry pool.

There is the option of going the charity entry route which would mean paying a premium on your entry with the additional amount going directly to that charity. Charity entries will go on sale on 1 December and will be first come, first served.

There will also be thousands of entries that will go up for substitution. This is managed through the entry portal which mitigates the risk of fraud.

I also believe that we need to look at allowing substitutions, particularly for the half marathon, at the expo. The technology should allow for this and it will help to stop the problem of rampant bib banditting. My initial and unrefined thoughts would be that an amount, say R250, is donated directly to one of the TOMI charities for expo substitutions. Other than raising money for good causes, this would hopefully stigmatise bib bandits as ‘stealing from charities’. I would also suggest a R1,000 fine (once again with the money going into the charity kitty) for anyone caught swapping bibs.

One further aspect that needs to be looked at is enforcing anti-cheating rules and removing those who cheated in 2025 from the entry process. Two Oceans rules allow for a two year ban for anyone who cheated. There are a small number of in-race cheats that have not yet been disciplined and there were 346 ultra and 748 half marathon start batch jumpers in 2025.

Nothing personal

Getting a ‘We regret to inform you’ text message is not pleasant. None of us like rejection but it’s nothing personal. There are still plenty of chances to get your entry secured. The Two Oceans ballot system rewards loyalty so running in 2026 will make it easier to get an entry in future years.

With the election of a new board that has the best interests of the event and runners as their primary focus and a professional staging company in place with the skills and expertise to organise the largest running event in South Africa, Two Oceans is back. Expect Two Oceans 2026 to be a true return to form. I am looking forward to my 21st Two Oceans ultra and hope that those disappointed after the first ballot will still get their ticket to Cape Town for April 2026.

Follow Running Mann:
Share:

37 Replies to “A Deep Dive into the Two Oceans Ballot Entry Process”

  1. Thank you for the breakdown of how the ballot system works . Very interesting to read . Thank you for taking the time to write and inform us all.
    Assume the 25 BNC is for the Ultra runners and not a combine 56 and 21km total?

  2. Thanks for the explanation. Would it not be fair to give the first timers first opportunity? I have done two ultra marathons and would love to do only one half as I’m getting older.

    1. It’s a tricky situation and whichever approach is taken someone is going to feel aggrieved. Hopefully you are lucky in the November draw – if not there will be a lot of substitutions on offer.

  3. Thanks Stuart. I am trying to understand reason for 2nd ballot draw. Not possible to have one draw and then a residual draw for any left. You 100% sure all BNC got entries?

  4. Thank you for the clear explanation. Other than the event being a premier one where to run it is highly desirable, do consider adding another ‘pre-requisite’ to the process.
    Whatever it is must assist South African society. An example of this is blood donors, organ donors and those on the SA Bone Marrow Registry should also get preference.

    Thoughts welcome

  5. I have 4 x Completed Two Oceans events, and 1 x DNF where my partner’s knee gave in 2km from the finish line, and I decided to rather stay with her. We are both Club Runners. Neither of us made the cut for the Half.

    Seems we fell short of all the various exceptions, and will probably still need to rely on luck if we ever try to enter for this again.

  6. Great article, give stats to those worked up over their own situation without the big picture. Any reason for not doing detailed look on the final ultra ballot split? My sample set of 60 indicates that novices got far luckier than this with 1-4 finishes. Will be very happy to be wrong.

  7. Stuart! You are an absolute legend!!! Thank you for all the hard work that you put in to present us with these clear details surrounding the entry process. We, as runners are incredibly lucky to have you and I personally appreciate your dedication to our community. I might add, without your involvement, I do believe that there would be substantially less people looking to run. You have saved this event and we owe you a debt of gratitude.

  8. Hi Stuart, thank you for your detailed summary on how the ballot system works, I’m sure those runners who received the dreaded message “We regret to……” will now understand how this system works, and will be looking forward to standing a big chance of being successful in the 2nd draw in November 👌🙏

  9. Thanks for this breakdown. I am struggling to understand the rationale for having a second ballot that functions in this way. Why not allocate all 14 000 spots for the ultra in the first ballot, and then those enteries where people do not pay, go into the second ballot in Nov? Is there a reason why nearly 5000 spots, that we know are available and within the permit standards, cannot be allocated in the first ballot?

  10. I don’t see any consideration given to those within South Africa who need to book and make travel arrangements. There’s a limited amount of flights and accommodation available and having to wait that long can make it so costly that participating isn’t financially justified.

  11. Hi Stuart,

    Thank you for your hard work and this detailed analysis. I haven’t seen an article on the outcome of the TOM AGM and which directors were successfully elected (perhaps I missed it). Could you please attach a link or kindly inform us of the outcome. I trust you were successfully elected in the interests of all runners.

    Thanks again.

      1. Congratulations and well done. I know you will do the hard work and bring the integrity back to this race. Good luck to you and the new board.

  12. Skukuza half-marathon is another SA event which allocates entries via ballot, and it seems to be the most fair option. Seeing all the ugliness surrounding entries to Boston marathon, I hope Two Oceans avoids the good-for-age approach.

    1. Thanks Caroline, I did not realise that Skukuza was also a ballot system. I agree that the Boston model is not preferable. For good for age, I would have it as very small group like those those finished top 3 in each age category at the previous event.

  13. Thanks you for a great breakdown Stuart.
    And oh, even though my wife and family chose me, I’ll gladly accept that extra entry you still have, thank you in advance.

  14. Will there be Two Ocean trail events again in 2026….you know for those who got the “we regret” messages to still be part of the event weekend?

  15. Thank-you for the detailed breakdown of the ballot process.

    One issue I have is that all people who have done 4 or more half-marathons were guaranteed to get in, and this represents a substantial proportion of the number of ballots available. This should go down to a figure like 75% as it merely ensures those who have many chances to run it are able to run it again, leaving far less of a chance to expand the pool of runners, which should be the aim of the TOM.

  16. This might seem trivial – but please can we go back to the sizing of the 2024 tees. They were pretty accurate. 2025’s sizing for the women’s tees were horrible, way too small. Also, let’s not do dull pastel colours again 🙂

  17. Thanks for the detailed breakdown, this goes a long way to helping runners understand the process and stops second-guessing the selection and conspiracy theories. Batch number jumpers contributed to lots of congestion last year in the half, with the first few batches in the chutes so packed legitimate numbered runners could not enter the chute.

  18. Hi Stuart

    Another great article of yours but there is a typing error re Half-marathon entries for Non-Club Runners novices. The figure given is 3595 available but it should have been 1000 available.

  19. Hi Stuart,

    Thank you very much for the explanation. I finally ran a qualifying time in September and getting that rejection message felt like a punch to the gut. But rather that than have the entire race cancelled. Your thorough explanation has at the very least given me an indication of what my chances are of getting an entry in the second draw.

    Quick question: Do you have any data on how many substitutions take place per year, on average?

  20. There remain entries available if runners are prepared to pay for the charity entries- at a higher total cost but the entire excess goes to charity. So basic entry fee is same but extra charge goes to charity.

    Please let us know what price these will be offered at.

  21. I have spoken to 2 people (first timers for Two Oceans) who both got entries for the Ultra in the first ballot and not one of them have ever run a marathon. How is this fair to runners who have completed multiple marathons and even Ultras such as Comradea or a Two Oceans Ultra.

  22. evening Stuart , my thought are that you should also allocate a portion of the ballot for first timers as the ballot is tilted in favour of those that have run the ultra /half marathon previously .How else are the first timers’ going to experience the two oceans vibe? i know I’m going to be shot down as i did not get an entry for the ultra, even though i have done 2 ultra and done 2 halfs. Just my thoughts on leveling the playing field

  23. Commenting way after this was posted, but I hope you still see this. This year, I COMPLETELY forgot to pay for my entry. This is totally my fault, as I should have done it right away. I heard that the Two Oceans social medias posted about these deadlines, but I didn’t see this, as I am not super active on social media. I own my mistake entirely, but had an email reminder come through a day or two before, I would have paid for it on the spot. Chatted to one or two others who made the same mistake. I also recently found out numerous last minute entries were made available as the substitution window closed. Again, this was posted on social media but I didn’t receive any emails. I was not registered for the e-Newsletter at the time, so perhaps this was another reason, but again, I would have liked to have received a reminder email. Maybe something to consider for 2027?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *